Double-Defense Design of Super-Anti-Fouling Membranes for Oil/Water Emulsion Separation
Dianyu Dong1, Yuzhang Zhu1,*, Wangxi Fang1, Miaozhou Ji2, Aqiang Wang2, Shoujian Gao1, Hongzhen Lin1, Rong Huang3, Jian Jin2,*
1 Chinese Acad Sci, Suzhou Inst Nanotech & Nanobion, I Lab, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
2 Soochow Univ, Coll Chem Chem Engn & Mat Sci, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Suzhou Nano Sci & Technol, Innovat Ctr Chem Sci, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
3 Chinese Acad Sci, Suzhou Inst Nanotech & Nanobion, Vacuum Interconnected Nanotech Workstn, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
Adv. Funct. Mater.2022, 32, 2113247
Oil fouling threatens the water flux stability of membranes for oil/water separation. Simple hydrophilic modification fights for an opportunity to prevent oil contamination but fails to eliminate severe water flux decline. In essence, a single-defense mechanism is insufficient to build a potent barrier against accumulated cake layer under a filtration environment. This work reports a double-defense design by integrating hydrophilic polymer brushes and hydrogel layer on oil/water separation membranes for desired anti-oil-fouling property, where a poly(vinylidene fluoride) porous membrane is first covered by a layer of poly(hydroxyethyl methylacrylate) hydrogel and then controllably grafted with poly(sulfobetaine) brushes. The spatially hierarchical structure establishes a highly covered double-defense barrier for the membrane surface to efficiently repel oil adhesion and the formation of an accumulated cake layer. When separating various surfactant-stabilized oil-in-water emulsions, the permeating flux displays a nearly zero decline throughout the whole filtration period. Most importantly, the permeating flux of the membrane is almost the same when filtrating pure water and filtrating oil-in-water emulsions, which is difficult to be achieved by the general membranes, indicating that the membrane has excellent anti-oil-fouling property superior to the currently reported membranes.
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/adfm.202113247